Vitamin D and executive functioning: Are higher levels better?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015 Dec 27:1-11. [Epub ahead of print]
Pettersen JA 1,2.
1a Northern Medical Program , University of Northern British Columbia , Prince George , BC , Canada.
2b Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada.
142 healthy adults tested for Verbal Fluency and Vitamin D
Fluency | Vitamin D |
16 | > 40 ng |
14 | 30-40 ng |
13 | 20-30 ng |
12 | < 20 ng |
Note - this could be the result to two independant assocations
- better health : higher vitamin D
- better health : higher word fluency
See also VitaminDWiki
- Parkinson's Disease poor verbal fluency and memory strongly associated with low vitamin D – Sept 2013
- Cognitive decline worse in winter (when vitamin D levels are lower) – July 2014 also by Patterson JA
- Cognition and vitamin D – summary of expert opinions – July 2014
- Cognition declined somewhat if low vitamin D – March 2014
- Cognition of Alzheimer’s patients improved by daily 4,000 IU of vitamin D – RCT Jan 2015
OBJECTIVES:
Insufficiency of 25-hydroxyvitamin D has been associated with cognitive impairment, particularly worse executive functioning. However, it remains unclear whether supratherapeutic levels (≥100 nmol L-1) are associated with even better performance than sufficient levels (defined as ≥50 nmol L-1 or even ≥75 nmol L-1). The current investigation sought to examine this question.
METHOD:
Healthy adults (n = 142) were tested on four measures of executive functioning, including verbal fluency, digit span backward, CANTAB® Spatial Working Memory, and One Touch Stockings of Cambridge. A measure of attention (digit span forward) and memory (CANTAB® Verbal Recognition) were also assessed. Based on blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D 25(OH)D levels, participants were divided into four groups: insufficient (<50 nmol L-1), low sufficient (50 to <75 nmol L-1), high sufficient (75 to <100 nmol L-1), and supratherapeutic (≥100 nmol L-1). Relationships between vitamin D status and cognition were assessed by analyses of covariance and hierarchical multiple regression, adjusted for age, education, sex, body mass index, mood, and physical activity level. Multivariate regression spline analyses were utilized to investigate nonlinearity.
RESULTS:
Performance on verbal fluency, but not other measures, differed by vitamin D status, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), F(3, 127) = 2.70, p = .048; d = 0.50. Specifically, participants with supratherapeutic levels provided a greater number of words (M = 16.1, SE = 1.0) than those with insufficient (M = 12.0, SE = 1.0; p = .007, d = 0.78), low (M = 13.4, SE = 0.7; p = .026, d = 0.51), and high sufficient levels (M = 13.9, SE = 0.9; p = .080, d = 0.42). Similarly, vitamin D status was a significant independent predictor of verbal fluency (p = .025, d = 0.40). Spline analyses revealed that there is a positive, near-linear association between verbal fluency and 25(OH)D levels up to and exceeding 100 nmol L-1.
DISCUSSION:
Supratherapeutic levels of vitamin D were associated with significantly better performance on verbal fluency. Importantly, commonly used cutoff levels and sufficiency categories have been based on bone health and optimal levels for cognition are unknown. These findings suggest that levels exceeding 100 nmol L-1 may be optimal for at least some aspects of executive functioning.
PMID: 26708262
Publisher charges $41 for the PDF
See also web
- Are vitamin D levels related to verbal fluency? Vitamin D Council Jan 2016
Which has the following chart
Study concluded “In conclusion, vitamin D levels exceeding 100 nmol/L (40 ng/ml) were found to be associated with significantly better performance on a verbal (phonemic) fluency task, which primarily assesses executive functioning. This implies that the optimal level for cognition is higher than that for bone health, and higher than previous studies have suggested. Spline analyses suggest that the relationship is not entirely linear, with an optimal level possibly around 120 nmol nmol/L (50 mg/ml).”